• Covering the Bronco Nation

Carr, Childs first class co-presidents

Related Content

Will Ritchie
May 28, 2010
Filed under News, Top Story

Nikki Childs and Taylor Carr reside over the senior class as the first co-presidents in the school’s history during Legacy’s fourth school year in 2010-2011.

After two class votes the candidates’ totals tied. Joking around to each other both times, Childs and Carr tossed around the idea of becoming co-presidencies. After Student Council sponsor Dena Schimming announces the intention to do just that, Carr and Childs latched onto the idea. Their first order of business involves figuring out who can handle which areas the best.

“When you have two people who obviously reach out to a different crowd then we have different opinions and a different perspective,” Carr said, “there will definitely be disagreements on a lot of things.”

To sort out who would run each specific area of being senior class president, Carr and Childs picked and chose their tasks over the phone, leaving things they couldn’t split like the end of the year speech for later.

“I think [working together] will be beneficial,” Carr said, “but I won’t say that it will be completely peaches and cream.”

Carr hopes the two very different personalities herself on Childs bring to the position will help to make the senior class more cohesive.

“We see this in our government now. We have some Republicans and some Democrats and Obama is trying to find some unity between the two,” Carr said, “what he taught in the beginning was that if you have an equal number of both then you have happy people, and that’s what we have here.”

Childs knows she will have some rocky situations to overcome with Carr during their tenure, but believes their friendship will help to overcome it.

“We’re not gonna agree on everything, but we’re mature enough to work it out so it won’t be a big deal,” Childs said.

When they first thought about being co-presidents, Carr and Childs began to split up the duties for the position, leaving the more difficult ones for later discussion.

“There are some things we cannot do together and we cannot tackle together because it requires one person, so the first thing I want to do is get those things settled now,” Carr said.

Carr and Childs have left the senior class speech decision alone, hoping they will be able to come to some sort of agreement that will allow both of them to tackle the speech.

“We’ll just wait and see,” Childs said, “I mean it’s not a big deal but it is the senior class speech.”

Carr believes the easiest way to split up the rest of the tasks involves determining who can, or cannot, perform the duty.

“We’re gonna figure out what my strengths are and my weaknesses and then what her strengths and weaknesses are and that’ll go into all the decisions we make,” Carr said.

Carr and Childs have been friends since eighth grade. Using their friendship as a basis for their co-presidency, Carr and Childs believe they will accomplish far more together than they ever could alone.

“We’re both really close to different people and hopefully it will help us when we make decisions for the entire student body,” Childs said, “We get along really well.”

Comments

4 Responses to “Carr, Childs first class co-presidents”

  1. Jenny Davis Says:

    Personally, I think Taylor should have it. She won both elections fair and square. But of course, I’m a senior so it doesn’t affect me. Good luck.

  2. Anonymous Says:

    I think it’s wrong that Taylor won both times, but by a margin that wasn’t “large enough.” Yet there was no discernment as to what a specific margin was….this is as ridiculous as Bush & Gore 2000. This instance unfortunately proves true the politics that permeates MISD. Nikki was given the co-presidency because she’s been involved in student council for the past 3 years, and Taylor I’m sure didn’t agree to a co-presidency when she rightfully won. These kinds of decisions are the same reasons voters become discouraged in many instances, because they quickly learn that their vote in no way counts, because an “executive” decision will take precedence over the process.

  3. Allex Ohler Says:

    GO TAYLOR AND NIKKI! WOOH! :)
    whats better than one class president?
    TWO CLASS PRESIDENTS!

  4. Mrs. Schimming Says:

    A couple of other details to know about the co-presidency:
    1) Winners were never announced nor were the number of votes per candidate. Anything that was talked about was strictly rumor.
    2) Taylor and Nikki were given the option to have a run-off election or particpate in a co-precidency.
    3) They were asked to go home and discuss their options with their parents and each other before giving Mr. Wright a final decision.
    4) This option was given because they both asked for it.
    5) Lastly and most importantly, the student body was split 50/50 on who they wanted for the office. So, this unconventional option gives the student body what they wanted by having both of these amazing students as their leaders.
    This is a win / win situation for everyone involved and it makes everyone a winner.
    I am excited to see what these two ladies do together.

Leave a Reply

Rss Feed Tweeter button Facebook button Digg button Youtube button